Hvorfor har du valgt at spille så mange uropførelser til en koncert?
På mit masterstudium har jeg tidligere arrangeret «Erik Nerheim Saxofonfestival 2012», hvor jeg afholdt 25 koncerter på tre dage. Dette var blandt andet et forsøg på at gøre noget spektakulært - men uden at det blev på bekostning af det musikalske indhold. Den koncert ville jeg gerne følge op på og valgte at sætte rekord i uropførelser. Koncerten på søndag med navnet «68 kompositioner» er også spektakulær, men har alligevel en musikalsk tyngde og et fokus: at det er muligt at formidle klassisk saxofon og samtidsmusik til et bredt publikum - uden at det bliver på bekostning af musikken.

Herudover er det også vigtig at forny litteraturen og altså blive ved med at bestille nykomponeret musik til saxofonen. Bare til denne koncert er saxofonrepertoiret blevet betragteligt udvidet. Det er vigtigt ikke bare at konservere men også at forny.

For mig er det interessant med en sådan slags «collagekoncert», der springer fra stil til stil og udtryk til udtryk - hvert eneste minut. Jeg har inviteret alle til at skrive, som havde lyst, så derfor er der også en grad aleatorik i projektet. Det synes jeg er spændende. Jeg satte en form på koncerten og inviterede folk til at fylde den med det, de havde lyst til, indenfor de rammer jeg havde sat (max 1 minut, for saxofon mm.). Jeg vidste ikke, hvad folk ville skrive eller i hvilken stil, og det har været umådeligt spændende at modtage værker og begynde at arbejde med dem. Jeg ville gerne lave noget kollektivt, hvor jeg ikke var eneansvarlig og alene havde kontrol med, hvordan udtrykket blev.

Værkerne er primært skrevet af nordiske komponister, hvorfor?
Bortset fra en komponist, er de alle nordiske eller studerer i et nordisk land. Hovedgrunden til dette er nok så enkelt som min kontaktflade og netværk, da jeg kender flere komponister i de nordiske lande. Da det i april gik op for mig, at jeg ville lave dette projekt, annoncerede jeg det på facebook, ligesom jeg skrev e-mails til komponister og musikere, som jeg kender. Det var ikke et mål, at det stort set udelukkende skulle være nordiske komponister, men sådan blev det, efterhånden som folk svarede tilbage.  

Mellem hvert værk, skal der ikke klappes. Er der ikke en fare for at det enkelte værk glider i baggrunden til fordel for én stor komposition? 
Det er selvfølgelig meget på grund af tid og koncertdramaturgi, at folk ikke skal klappe imellem hvert værk, men det er jo også for at understrege selve konceptet. Ofte er det 68 musikere som spiller én komponist. Her vender jeg det på hovedet: 68 komponister fremføres af én musiker. På en måde kan man sige, at magtforholdet mellem komponist og udøver er blevet byttet rundt. Det er jo klart, at hvert eneste værk, som er blevet leveret til mig til koncerten, har en værdi i sig selv, men samtidig bliver de også en del af et større værk – i dette tilfælde koncerten med den aktuelle udøver. Den røde tråd igennem alle kompositionerne på denne koncert er, at det bliver opført af mig. Hele koncerten, sat sammen af 68 etminutsværker, bliver jo også et stort musikværk, i tillæg til at koncerten og alt omkring den selvfølgelig bliver et konceptværk. Alle musikere i et orkester er selvfølgelig vigtige i sig selv, men de udgør også noget mere end kun sig selv, når de har funktionen af musiker i et orkester. For mig er der en pointe i at understrege denne problematik. 

Når alt dette er sagt, så er det vigtigt for mig at præcisere at alle de kompositioner, jeg har modtaget, er vældig gode, og har en stor værdi enkeltstående. Målet for koncerten er, at både den enkelte kompositioner og makrokompositionen kommer tydelig frem.

Koncerten er 2. juni kl. 19.00 i Lindemansalen,
Norges musikkhøgskole, Slemdalsveien 11. 

Læs mer om koncerten
Koncerten ligger også på Facebook

Foto: Silje Måseide

in briefrelease
14.03.2025

Caught Between Too Much and Too Little

Amphior: »Disappearing«
Amphior. © Rikke Broholm
Amphior. © Rikke Broholm

Electronic musician Amphior, aka Mathias Hammerstrøm, opens on a positive note: »Under the Stars« exudes a Twin Peaks–like melancholic romanticism infused with an unsettling timbre that raises expectations. By the second track, however, it becomes clear that the listening experience will not be quite as positive as one might initially have hoped.

»Time Is a Thief« simply does not impress in the same way. On top of the clichéd ticking clock in the background, neither the piano melody nor the atmospheric elements make much of an impact, stuck in the nondescript middle ground between too much and too little. Unfortunately, this alternation between compelling tracks and more filler-like pieces comes to characterize the release as a whole.

Both »Healing« and »Disappearing« feature strong melodies with a delicate, ethereal, bittersweet melancholy. Like »Time Is a Thief«, »Bloom« also employs a ticking clock as a background element, but to far better effect, as the music above it is much more captivating – not least thanks to Stine Benjaminsen’s (aka Recorder Recorder) clipped vocal samples, which lend the track a welcome sense of strangeness. The release does, however, contain a number of tracks that never manage to leave a lasting impression, no matter how many times one listens. A melody that simply needed a bit more life. An effect that could have benefited from being turned up. It is a shame, because on roughly half of the tracks Hammerstrøm demonstrates that he is capable of creating truly beautiful music.

© PR

»How comforting, after so much menial self-investigation, to finally be told exactly what it is that you need. The delirious British post-punk outfit The Fall, in their song on the very subject, will have you convinced it’s a bit of Iggy Stooge, a reduced smoking habit, sex without having it, slippery shoes for your horrible feet; to that solid list, I’ll append an injunction to hear out a few minutes of other music, specifically chosen to corrupt your personal spacetime. And sure, drink water, wash your face, go outside – like that’s doing anything.« 

Jennifer Gersten is a violinist and writer from New York City. Her feature reporting, essays, and music criticism appear in The New York Times, The New Yorker, Bloomberg, Rolling Stone and Seismograf, among other publications. A former tenured tutti violinist with Helsingborg Symfoniorkester (Sweden), Jennifer pursues solo and collaborative projects in new and improvised music in the US and Scandinavia, some of which earned her an honorable mention for Darmstadt Ferienkurse’s 2023 Kranichsteiner Musikpreis. 

in briefrelease
07.03.2025

A Daring Vision of Flute and Voice

© Samantha Riott
© Samantha Riott

So dextrous a musician is the flutist Laura Cocks that, at shows, their instrument occurs to the eye as merely another limb. A powerhouse New York-based collaborator and interpreter within new classical and experimental music, notably as director of the leading-edge new music group TAK Ensemble, Cocks now releases their first solo statement of improvised compositions with FATHM, an acrobatic intertwining of flute and voice that nods to strange and fleeting visions: among them, birds, string, seeds between the teeth. On FATHM, Cocks applies all the facility of their work as an interpreter of commissioned works – on extensive display in their last solo venture, 2022’s field anatomies – towards the development of an uninhibited, yet highly focused musical language. 

If the album’s mysterious tracklist reads as a sort of cryptogram, then listening to FATHM evokes a process of decoding, parsing the bounds between vocalization and instrument. The album’s opening track, »A thread held between your fingers«, finds Cocks as their own flickering shadow, simultaneously playing the flute and squealing in tones just slightly removed in pitch. »Illinois« is then reclaimed from Sufjan Stevens’ relentless grip as a furious mumble of half-blown notes with underlying trickles of voice. Cocks experiments further with these hoarse timbres on the three infinitive tracks: »To beget« and its later variations »To outstretch« and concluding track »To fly«, which trace the evolution of a dancelike triplet motif. »FAVN«, apparently a faithful depiction of an elephant with severe sleep apnea, may reconcile itself to the sensitive listener through its sheer commitment to the grotesque, while »A seed sucked between your teeth«, orbiting languidly around a major ninth, invites more celestial considerations. »A marsh wren« might take the titular bird as a point of departure, but it quickly imagines a species of its own, singing a song of bustle and snaps and smacks. On »YARN«, Cocks suggests another sort of animal song by making a counterpoint of mews and growls. The flutist’s skill with balancing these peculiar hybrids ultimately distinguishes FATHM as much as Cocks’ ferocious energy; this is an album as happy to shout as it is to slither. 

in brieflive
03.03.2025

Cosmic Resonance

Satellite Synthesizer – Ørntoft/Anker/Osgood/Snöleoparden
© Mia Mathilde Andersson
© Mia Mathilde Andersson

Against enemies in outer space, »music is the strongest weapon we have,« Mads Brügger recently stated here in Seismograf. Snöleopard and musical friends made this idea strikingly concrete by sending music directly from the Planetarium in Copenhagen out into space, targeting satellites between 500 and 35,000 kilometers away. The tones returned altered by delay, radio noise, and cosmic interference. On the large screen, the Earth’s surface – seen from a satellite – rolled by with all its illuminated cities, while Theis Ørntoft read from his forthcoming climate-conscious novel, delivering lines such as: »The day there is no more oil, the lights will go out in the world.« Meanwhile, we could see small green dots of confused satellites racing across the Earth’s beautiful curvature and hear Lotte Anker, Kresten Osgood, and Snöleopard free-jazzing on saxophone, drums, and sitar respectively.

The small crackling beep-sounds from the satellites’ resonance also generated music, but the most interesting moments came when the musicians received fragments of their own motifs back – thrown down from outer space – and a kind of internal interplay emerged. Is there something out there, or are we merely talking to ourselves?

Cosmic resonance filled the dome, but one could wish for more internal resonance. There is a beautiful trend in ensembles that include a poet, allowing many delightfully twisted formulations to surface, but the musicians must also interpret the words – enter into a musical exegesis, as they would with a traditional jazz singer – otherwise the music easily becomes background or secondary. As if each musician were a green satellite dot in their own orbital path. Many good ideas were in play – and music is not a weapon. But it does require internal resonance. Not only cosmic.

English translation: Andreo Michaelo Mielczarek

in briefrelease
28.02.2025

A Clammy Kawaii Crescendo

Keiichiro Shibuya: »ANDROID OPERA MIRROR«
© PR

If the Japanese composer and musician Keiichiro Shibuya’s new album ANDROID OPERA MIRROR were to be summed up in a single word, that word would be »bombastic«. From the very first track, »MIRROR«, the listener is bombarded with gliding synth violins, brass, and a robotic voice intoning existential questions – ironically written by an AI.

There is something charmingly awkward about Shibuya’s pop-oriented, over-the-top compositions and the android vocal’s cloying kawaii factor. But before the album is halfway through, the constant pomposity begins to wear thin. »On Certainty«, with its ever-present strings and densely packed arrangements, rarely gives the music – or the listener – room to breathe. Shibuya and his android voice are saying an awful lot all the time, and it is so overwhelming that very little of it actually carries weight. When everything feels like an epic crescendo or the expected release from one, the effect is lost.

Taken individually, several of the tracks are otherwise quite compelling: »Midnight Swan (Android Opera ver.)«, which sounds like the opening theme to a dark and romantic anime, and the closing track »Scary Beauty (Vocal and Piano ver.)«, which shines precisely by trimming away the excess and focusing on the emotional core of the composition – an impact made far stronger by the simpler instrumentation. When the listener is not constantly overwhelmed, the romance, melancholy, and existential questions are allowed to make an impression. Unfortunately, ANDROID OPERA MIRROR is a listening experience that frustrates through its lack of subtlety – something it would otherwise have benefited greatly from.

English translation: Andreo Michaelo Mielczarek