The term Dadaism must be used with caution – it easily risks becoming a cliché and trampling disrespectfully on its origins. Nevertheless, it’s hard to avoid Dada when listening to The Swamp, created by Norwegian experimental composers Maja Ratkje, Torstein Slåen, and Sigurd Ytre-Arne. The album is a 40-minute chaotic mirror of our times, shaped by merciless improvisation, noise drones, and Ratkje’s absurd vocalizations.

The music is raw, rancid, and deliberately un-beautiful – a constant stream of manipulated field recordings, reminiscent of a horror film foley studio. Bells, metallic clanks, white noise, and industrial sounds are warped together, driven by a syncopated, menacing rhythm and an underlying fuzz drone. Most fascinating is Ratkje’s voice, which appears as a riddle: is she singing in Celtic, Norwegian, or pure gibberish? The latter seems most likely and evokes the Dada poetry of Kurt Schwitters, particularly his 1932 Ursonate. At the same time, her vocal techniques dig deep into Nordic soil – conjuring the spirit of völva chants and Viking songs.

The combination of controlled noise and purposeful chaos elevates much of the album, with the opening track and the completely unhinged »Discomanic« standing out. The former is as close as the trio gets to something conventional; the latter borders on pure sound art. Only the two slower pieces – the seven-minute-long »Oligarchification« and »Lullaby for Trembling Hearts« – tend to drag a bit. Otherwise, the group manages to keep the material focused, sharp, and intensely trippy. It’s impressive how effectively it all works, even as the expression remains so relentless and challenging.

English translation: Andreo Michaelo Mielczarek
 

Begrebet dadaisme må bruges med varsomhed – det risikerer let at blive en kliché og trampe respektløst på sin oprindelse. Alligevel er det svært at komme udenom netop dadaismen, når man hører The Swamp, skabt af de norske eksperimentalkomponister Maja Ratkje, Thorstein Slåen og Sigurd Ytre-Arne. Albummet er et 40 minutters kaotisk spejl af samtiden, formet af nådesløs improvisation, støjdroner og Ratkjes absurde vokal.

Musikken er rå, harsk og direkte uskøn – en konstant strøm af manipulerede reallyde, som leder tankerne hen på et foley-studie fra en horrorfilm. Klokker, metalklange, hvid støj og industrielle lyde warpes ind over hinanden, mens en synkoperet, truende rytme og en gennemgående fuzz-drone driver musikken fremad. Mest fascinerende er Ratkjes vokal, som fremstår som et mysterium: synger hun på keltisk, norsk eller blot volapyk? Det sidste virker mest sandsynligt og vækker mindelser om Kurt Schwitters’ dada-poesi, især Ursonate fra 1932. Samtidig trækker hendes vokalteknikker tråde ned i nordisk muld – mod vølvesang og vikingeviser.

Kombinationen af kontrolleret støj og målrettet kaos løfter det meste af albummet, hvor åbningsnummeret og den komplet ustyrlige »Discomanic« bør fremhæves. Førstnævnte er det tætteste, trioen kommer på noget konventionelt; sidstnævnte grænser til rendyrket lydkunst. Kun de to langsommere numre – den syv minutter lange »Oligarchification« og »Lullaby for Trembling Hearts« trækker lidt ud. Ellers formår gruppen at holde materialet fokuseret, skarpt og ekstremt syret. Det er imponerende, hvor effektivt det hele virker, når udtrykket samtidig er så nådesløst og udfordrende.

Surely, I can’t be the only one who nearly choked on my oyster on New Year’s Eve, when King Frederik X delivered his first New Year’s speech. What a modern take on the old tradition! Instead of sitting solemnly at a desk, he calmly walked into the room – a room demanding attention, where a futuristic mural stole the show. I could barely focus on the speech itself, distracted by the psychedelic imagery behind him: a visual nod to Yellow Submarine by The Beatles. Was this a sign of a rock star ascending the throne?

Wishful thinking, as it turned out. The speech turned into a parade of predictable platitudes. The same can be said about the King’s new Honour March, composed by David M. A. P. Palmquist, former conductor of the Royal Danish Life Guards Music Corps. A traditional and sluggish piece that plays it entirely by the book.

Since H.C. Lumbye gifted a march to Frederik VII in 1861, it has been a tradition for members of the royal family to be granted personal marches. Take the lively and self-ironic Parade March for Queen Margrethe, which includes quotes from both »I Danmark er jeg født« and »Daisy Bell«. Or Crown Prince Frederik’s brisk and quirky Honour March in 6/8 time – written by Fuzzy for the now-King’s 30th birthday – tipping its hat to Carl Nielsen’s »Som en rejselysten flåde«.

But where is the personal character in Palmquist’s march? The composer approaches the task far too conceptually, attempting to give the piece a musical signature with a kind of rebus at the beginning. The first note is an F, followed by one ten steps higher – thus spelling »Frederik the 10th« in musical code. The many references to other military music are just as internal. What’s missing is something that breaks with protocol – just like King Frederik himself has done in his most memorable and beloved moments. In the end, it sounds like a march that has forgotten who it was written for.

English translation: Andreo Michaelo Mielczarek. Proofreading: Seb Doubinsky

Jeg kan næppe være den eneste, der var ved at få østersen galt i halsen nytårsaften, da Kong Frederik X holdt sin første nytårstale. Sikke en modernisering af den gamle tradition! I stedet for at sidde klar ved bordet, trådte han roligt ind i rummet – et opmærksomhedskrævende rum, hvor et futuristisk vægmaleri stjal fokus. Jeg kunne knap nok høre talen for bare at stirre på det psykedeliske motiv bag ham: en visuel hilsen til Yellow Submarine med The Beatles. Et varsel om en rockstjerne på tronen?

Ønsketænkning, skulle det vise sig. For talen var en parade af forudsigelige floskler. Det samme kan man sige kongens nye honnørmarch, komponeret af David M. A. P. Palmquist, tidligere dirigent i Den Kongelige Livgardes Musikkorps. En traditionsbunden og gumpetung sag, der følger alle kunstens regler. 

Siden H.C. Lumbye i 1861 forærede en march til Frederik 7., har det været en tradition, at medlemmer af den kongelige familie tildeles personlige marcher. Tag den livfulde og selvironiske Dronning Margrethes Parademarch – der både indeholder citater fra »I Danmark er jeg født« og »Daisy Bell«. Eller den tjeppe og skæve Kronprins Frederiks Honnørmarch i seksottendedele – skrevet af Fuzzy i anledning af kongens 30-års fødselsdag – der kipper med flaget til Carls Nielsens »Som en rejselysten flåde«. 

Men hvor er det personlige særpræg i Palmquists march? Komponisten går alt for konceptuelt til værks, når han indledningsvist forsøger at give marchen en signatur med en slags musikalsk rebus. Den første tone er et f, efterfulgt af en tone ti trin højere – sådan staver man til Frederik 10 med noder. Ligeså intern er marchens mange referencer til anden militærmusik. Man savner noget, som bryder med etiketten – præcis som Kong Frederik i sine mest mindeværdige og folkekære øjeblikke. Det ender med at lyde som en march, der har glemt, hvem den er skrevet til. 

Thorvaldsens Museum is a fitting place to unfold a narrative about the soul’s journey to the underworld. Not only are the halls filled with depictions of Greek mythology, the museum itself is a kind of mausoleum, with Bertel Thorvaldsen’s grave situated at the heart of an inner courtyard. Everything should align perfectly when the multimedia duo O Future stages the descent into Hades through sound and animated video projections. But it doesn’t.

Through eight rooms and five sound works, we move from the banks of the River Styx, through the underworld, and finally to Elysium, where the blissful afterlife awaits. Along the way, we are confronted with judgment, choice, and struggle – existential themes played out on the grandest scale. The electronic soundscape, delivered through headphones, begins with a simmering, oppressive digital lament and accelerates through the rooms to a heavy electronic beat layered with symphonic undertones. We hear jazzy saxophones, looped synths, and white noise, before safely arriving in a spherical, almost sacred, digital choir.

There’s an intriguing theme in the collision between digital voices and the idea of death, but it is drowned out by the many loose ends of the exhibition. Why, for instance, is there no synchronicity between sound and visuals? Why are videos consistently projected onto sculptures that bear no relation to Greek mythology? And why the oddly synthetic color palette that evokes 1990s MTV more than it does the vast drama the story seeks to evoke? I hurriedly close my eyes and try to focus on the beat – but it’s too late. Orpheus has turned his head, and Eurydice is lost. So is this exhibition.

English translation: Andreo Michaelo Mielczarek