Democratic conversation and collectively improvised music have such pronounced similarities that improvisations can be discussed in terms of their democratic potentiality. To do this, we firstly develop a democratic-communicative understanding of music as a communicative social interaction holding democratic potentials. This is done by applying the German philosopher and sociologist Jürgen Habermas’ ideals for democratic conversation towards a musical context.
Secondly, we turn to our case study, Free Jazz Mod Paludan, a Danish activist community effort utilizing improvised musical noise as an audible protest against fascism and racism. Based on our theoretical understanding, we develop an analytically applicable framework structured through three levels of sociality. On a micro-social level, our analysis shows that the fulfillment of the democratic potentials of noise varies through both the establishment and lack of social ties between improvising Free Jazz Mod Paludan participants. On a meso-social level, noise shows to have potentials to both drown out contributions to the democratic conversation, as well as protecting and giving voice to marginalized groups. On a macro-social level, we find that Free Jazz Mod Paludan’s improvised noise potentially articulates specific political statements within a wider political discourse.
This elucidates the complex ways in which collectively improvised music and noise acts in a democratic conversation calling for critical attention towards democratic potentiality.